Tag: Florida Landlord-Tenant Disputes

Tenants filing for bankruptcy is less of an issue for residential landlords, but an increasingly frustrating problem for commercial landlords as we get further into 2018. As a result, it is important—now more than ever—that commercial landlords know what their rights are when it comes to how tenant bankruptcy affects lease agreements.

Rules: Before & After Filing for Bankruptcy

First and foremost, it is crucial to understand that, once a tenant files for bankruptcy, landlords and other parties are prohibited from taking any action against the tenant (i.e. debtor) unless it is first approved by the bankruptcy court. However, if a tenant is in default prior to filing for bankruptcy, and the landlord takes every step required under state law to terminate the lease before they file, the lease is then not subject to the tenant’s bankruptcy case. This is because it is the act of the tenant filing for bankruptcy that imposes an automatic stay against any actions by landlords and other parties (where actions are any activities involving collecting, demanding, or otherwise seeking to recover amounts due).

There have been a number of disputes around the country of late between landlords and homeowners associations and tenants/homeowners of late over what rights homeowners have to display particular items; for example, flags that others may find offensive. As a result, we thought we would provide some background on what rights both landlords and homeowners associations have in limiting certain types of displays in communities.

When these types of disputes reach litigation, landlords typically file a claim arguing that tenants contractually gave up any free speech rights by their execution of the lease agreement, which bans objectionable conduct; the unreasonable conduct being actions that are unreasonable in character. In the instance of homeowners associations, buyers agree to certain restrictive covenants when they purchase their home, which associations then have the right to enforce.

As the Wall Street Journal reported this month, video evidence has emerged as a powerful tool in housing court battles, especially in exposing tenants who have fraudulently claimed rent-controlled apartments as primary residences in order to pass those rights onto relatives in violation of the law.

As a result, courts have recently upheld the rights of landlords to mount hidden security cameras in lobbies, hallways, and other shared spaces, in spite of tenants arguing that video surveillance is an intrusive form of harassment.

Many property owners and businesses establish video surveillance in order to provide for security measures, prevent crime, and protect customers. Thus, it makes sense that landlords and property managers would have some of the same rights as business owners, even if video surveillance is established in order to monitor tenants.

The Law in Florida regarding Surveillance Cameras