Archive: July 2022

When interpreting an insurance policy, the choice of law will often determine how a court will enforce that policy’s terms. In this context, choice of law refers to which state’s laws govern the policy. Or in some cases, whether federal law may also apply.

A recent decision from a federal judge here in Florida, Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Lassiter, provides a case in point. This insurance dispute involved both federal and state choice-of-law questions–specifically, what laws to apply to a boating accident.

A man named Lassiter leased a boat called Shmily from a corporate owner. Lassiter hired another named Russick to captain the boat. Russick, acting as Lassiter’s intermediary, applied for an insurance policy for the boat. In that application, Russick failed to disclose the fact Lassiter had a 15-year-old misdemeanor domestic violence conviction. This will become relevant later.

Employment is usually “at-will” in Florida. In other words, an employer is free to fire an employee, or an employee is free to quit and seek employment elsewhere. In many cases, a former employee will find work with another firm that is a direct competitor with the former employer.

Some employers want to protect themselves from this situation by having their key employees sign employment contracts with restrictive covenants. Common examples of such covenants include non-compete, non-solicitation, and nondisclosure clauses. But are such restrictive covenants actually enforceable in Florida?

The short answer is “yes.” Section 542.335 of the Florida Statutes does expressly state that a contract containing one or more restrictive covenants may be enforceable provided they are “reasonable in time, area, and line of business.” So what exactly does that mean?

The Rules Governing Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreements

Policyholders are understandably upset when an insurance company denies their claim for coverage. This can lead to litigation, typically for breach of contract. But what about other equitable legal remedies? For instance, can you sue an insurer in Florida for unfair trade practices or “unjust enrichment”?

Federal Court Rejects Lawsuit Over Travel Insurance Policy for Canceled Flight

This issue came up in a recent decision from the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, Arencibia v. AGA Service Company, which was asked to apply Florida law to a dispute arising from a travel insurance policy. The plaintiff in this case purchased a plane ticket from Miami to Bogota, Colombia. At the time he booked his ticket, he was offered optional travel insurance, which was issued by the defendant. The plaintiff elected to purchase the insurance.

The plaintiff later canceled his plane trip because a work commitment overlapped with his planned Colombia trip. The plaintiff believed his insurance was a “no fault” policy, so he could cancel his trip for any reason and still receive coverage. But the defendant later informed the plaintiff that the policy he purchased was “a named perils travel insurance program, which means it covers only the specific situations, events and losses included in” the policy. As the plaintiff’s reason for canceling his ticket–being required to work–was not covered, he was not entitled to coverage.

When you purchase a deeded timeshare, you are actually buying an interest in real property. As with any real estate purchase, many buyers finance their timeshares by taking out a mortgage loan. Additionally, many timeshare contracts require residents to pay certain maintenance fees and assessments, just as you would with any homeowners’ association.

So if you fail to pay your mortgage or maintenance fees on time, can your timeshare interest actually be subject to foreclosure? The short answer is “yes.” And under Florida law, timeshare holders may be subject to a quicker legal process than a normal residential foreclosure.

Judicial vs. Non-Judicial Foreclosure

When it comes to residential homeowners, Florida law requires a judicial foreclosure process. This means that the mortgage lender or homeowners’ association (HOA) must go to court and file a lawsuit against the homeowner. The homeowner has the right to contest the action in a formal court hearing. But if the homeowner does not contest the proceeding, or the judge decides the lender or HOA’s case has merit, the court can order the property sold at a foreclosure auction.