Archive: May 2017

When you’re contemplating or already engaged in the process of going through a divorce, ensuring that you work with the right divorce attorney is crucial. While you may be considering contacting attorneys referred to you by family or friends, perhaps you also found some law firms online that practice divorce law locally. But how do you know that they will care about your case, and ensure that your rights are protected throughout the process?

When it comes to ensuring that your divorce is handled right, you want to make sure that you do your homework in selecting a divorce attorney to work with. To start, there are some basic questions you should ask any attorney you are thinking of hiring for your case, which include:

It is crucial to find out if your attorney has specifically been practicing in family law, and if so, how many divorce cases they’ve handled. Depending upon the circumstances of your case, have they also worked in related important areas, such as child custody, property and asset distribution, etc.? If they have handled numerous divorce cases, do they have a particular clientele in these cases, such as focusing on fathers’ rights, etc.?

When parents get divorced and/or otherwise go through a child custody dispute, sometimes the court will appoint what’s known as a Guardian Ad Litem to represent the child’s best interests (as a neutral third party). Guardians Ad Litem have typically completed mandatory training courses in order to become advocates, and effectively end up serving as trusted advisors for your child. In fact, in some instances, the parents themselves will request to have a Guardian Ad Litem put in place.

The Guardian need not necessarily be an attorney, but if they aren’t, they must be certified by Florida’s Guardian Ad Litem program or by a legal aid program (unless the case involves allegations of child abuse, in which case the Guardian must either be an attorney or an individual certified by the state program). Under Florida state law, Guardians Ad Litem have considerable power, arguably assisting the court as the trier of fact in an effort to protect the best interests of the child.

There are some key differences when it comes to the management of condominium versus homeowners associations in Florida. For example, this includes the ability to charge capital contribution fees, or the one-time charges associated with any transfer of title part of the association. For Florida homeowners’ associations, these fees typically range from $400 to $5,000, and are charged in order to ensure that there are finances in the association’s’ operating account (or capital reserves) once the developer leaves. These fees usually cover between one and three months of the association’s annual assessment amount.

In general, while condominium associations face certain restrictions when it comes to fees like these, homeowners’ associations, conversely, can charge these fees to new owners and/or to process lease applications.

The Condo and Homeowner’s Association Law in Florida

Under Florida law, the state legislature must first approve any fees charged to owners and tenants when it comes to condo associations. While developers can charge these fees to the original purchasers, they can no longer charge them once turnover has occurred. Thus, for example, fees associated with processing a lease or sales application, or transfer fees, cannot exceed $100 per applicant (other than a husband/wife or parent/child, both of which are considered to be one applicant).

Going through formal divorce proceedings can be expensive with court costs and attorneys’ fees. One alternative option to seeking a divorce is a collaborative divorce. Collaborative divorces have become increasingly popular, are less expensive, and are less adversarial than traditional litigation.

A collaborative divorce is where the parties and their respective attorneys agree to handle the matter without the involvement of the court system. The parties attempt to amicably resolve the case through settlement negotiations and the hiring of experts i.e. a counselor, therapist, or accountant if necessary.

Some pros associated with collaborative divorces are there are no court imposed time restraints and if the collaborative divorce is not working, it can be ended by any one party and the parties can then proceed to litigation. However, the attorneys that represented the parties during the collaborative divorce can no longer represent their clients in the litigation. Another disadvantage to a collaborative divorce is that it has the potential to be more expensive if negotiations break down or if one party is not participating or acting reasonably. There is also no threat of court action to force the other party to participate reasonably.

On Monday March 20^th, a Florida appeals court sided with State Farm Florida concerning a dispute over whether insurance policy information can technically be considered a “trade secret” shielded from public disclosure. Insurance policy information frequently contains confidential business information which, if viewed by other companies, could provide them with a competitive advantage. While insurance companies have long been required to file such information with the government through the Quarterly and Supplemental Reporting System, companies like State Farm have sought to keep this information confidential (i.e. not disclosed to the public) precisely because the information could be used by competitors if made public.

After a Leon County circuit judge agreed with State Farm on this issue last year, the Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR) decided to appeal it in an effort to release the information to the public. However, on Monday, the three-judge appellate panel disagreed with the OIR that keeping the information confidential would harm consumers, undermine transparency, and increase the OIR’s administrative burden.